It's fair to say that Fleetwood Mac probably would never have achieved such mega success had it not been for Lindsey Buckingham. Not to marginalize guitarists Peter Green, Jeremy Spencer, or Bob Welch-all of whom contributed immensely to making Fleetwood Mac one of the most progressive blues-rock-pop bands of the 60's and early 70's-but it was Lindsey Buckingham's unique guitarstyle and savvy arranging, producig,and songwriting skills that guided the band tothe top of the charts in the mid 1970s with Fleetwood Mac and Rumours.

Born in Palo Alto,California, in 1949, Buckingham was inspired at an early age by the sounds of Elvis Presley and other '50's-era rock-and-rollers. "I had a brother who was seven years older, and when he started bringing those records home, I got very interested in tryig to lay the songs," explains Buckingham. "I eventually got a 3/4-sized guitar, but I never took any lessons. I just played to the records, and used a chord book to figure out how the songs went. Listeing to Scotty Moore eventally led me to Travis picking and other folk styles, and it just went from there."

Buckingham's first group was the Fritz Rabyne Memorial Band, which he co-founded with several friends-one of whom was singer Stevie Nicks. The group plied to San Francisco scene for a few years (with Buckingham on bass), and then broke up in 1971. Now a duo, Buckingham and Nicks relocated to Los Angeles, landed a record deal, and released Buckingham Nicks in 1973. After drummer/bandleader Mick Fleetwood heard the album, he invited them to join Fleetwood Mac.

Buckingham,Nicks and keyboardist Christine McVie subsequently churned out a string of hits that made fortunes for the band and its record label. Despite theie storied personal difficulties during the making of Rumours ,the band stayed the course, releasing Tusk in 1979 and Mirage in 1982. However, Buckingham was also pursuing a solo career-having released Law & Order i 1981 and Go Insane in 1984-and he left the group in 1987 after recording Tango in The Night.

But even after the release of his third solo album,Out Of The Cradle in 1992, it still wasn't over for Buckingham and Fleetwood Mac. In 1996, the band reunited to tor and film The Dance -a live DVD that featured the classic lineup performing its classic songs. Following the departure of Christine McVie after The Dance tour, Buckingham went back to work on what was supposed to be his fourth solo album. But that project would eventually turn into a new Fleetwood Mac double album to be released early in 2003.

Or would it? At press time, Warner Brothers was still debating whether to release a single or double CD set, and the album title and final song sequence was undecided. So here is the story of a work still in progress-one with a wealth of new songs by Buckingham and Nicks, and a huge dose of Buckingham's wickedly expressive fingerstyle playing.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

How did you solo album turn into a Fleetwood Mac production?

I started working on this record after coming off the road for a small tour in support of Out Of The Cradle. One day I ran into Mick Fleetwood, who I hadn't seen in quite a while, and we started talking about working together. At the same time, Rob Cavallo-who was producing Green Day at the time-became interested in working with me. So the three of us just started cutting tracks. I took most of the songs back to my house to finish them, and while that was happenig-as has occurred a few times in the past-the gravity of Fleetwood Mac just sucked me in.

At that time, there was a big push to do The Dance tour, so I put all my new stuff on the shelf throughout 1996. After the tour, I went back in and finished what was going to be my next solo albm. This was about the time that Warner Brothers was preparing to change a lot of staff, though, and I was a little worried that my record would get buried. I felt strongly that it was the best solo thing I had done, so I thought, "Well, I'll just wait." In the meantime, Stevie was around, and the whole idea of getting her in the picture came about. I wasn't sure that I was going to use my stuff for a Fleetwood Mac album, but we just decided to start cutting some of Stevie's songs while I waited for for the new regime at Warner to come in. From there, the whole project morphed into as Fleetwood Mac thing.

But without Christine McVie.

Yeah. At the end of the 40 or so dates of The Dance tour, Christine announced she didn't want to go out on the road anymore. I wasn't completely unhappy with her decision because I had my solo stuff to get back to.

How did her absence affect the sessions for this new album?

The band had to explore new creative options because Christine wasn't there. For example, we were forced to play differently because, suddenly, we were a three piece. Her absence also forced Stevie and I to establish a different dynamic with each other, and, ironically, it's a bit more like Buckingham Nicks. But I think that working through Christine's departure is one of the reasons thsi album sounds as fresh as it does.

Did it make a difference that your songs had been written specifically for a solo album?

I don't know if the songs would have turned out any different had I known I was going to use them for a Fleetwood Mac album-although the process in which they were brought along would have changed. When you're working wih a band, a communal sensibility influences things, and the songs that make it are the ones that everyone think are appropriate "band" songs. Obviously, that's not the case if I'm going off in a more esoteric direction on my own.

Which process do you prefer?

Well, there's an analogy that working with a band is like making movies, and working alone is like painting. I've spent many years alone in my garage experiencing the contemplative aspects of songwriting, and I think that has contributed positively to my ability to write songs and make records.

When you're writing a song, do you typically start with a guitar part?

Yes. I've always admired Stevie for her ability to have the vocal melody be the center of the song. In theory, that's how it should be. But the guitar is always the center of my songs, and writing is always a case of wondering, "What do I put over that?"

The great thing about Stevie is that she really isn't a musician, so 95 percent of her psyche is driving the melody. As a guitarist, I often find myself defining a guitar part before I even have a melody. There's nothing wrong with that, but it can be more problematic when you're trying to develop a song idea.

At one time, you and Stevie and Christine were masters of turning personal difficulties into hit songs. Is the ability to reflect on what's happening around you still a factor in your songwriting?

I don't really think of myself as a commentator of anything. I just try to find a lyric that has some truth, grace, and mystery. Hopefuly, it will bridge the line between something personal and something that's about the world in a broader sense.

On Rumours -which was probably the primary example of our lives laid bare-I don't think we were aware of what we were doing. Our situation was unique because two couples were breaking up while making a record, and the personal difficulties were fueling everything.

You were playing a Telecaster before you joined Fleetwood Mac, and then you started using a Les Paul. Was there any reason for the switch?

The band wanted me to play a humbucker guitar because Mick tuned his drums fairly low and Christine's keyboard sounds were kind of Wurlitzer-like and Rhodes-y. All that lower midrange stuff tended to make the Telecaster sound really scratchy and thin.

I did use the Telecaster onstage before Fleetwood Mac was released. Those weren't big shows, but Mick was very adamant that we get out there and get some chops as a band. So there was a certain amount of obscurity working in our favor in terms of being able to play around and make some mistakes. I guess using the Tele live was one of them.

Were there any other things you had to change to fit in with the band?

Yes-it was quite a lesson in adaptation. I did everything from switching my guitar to become a less present as a player in order to do the right thing for the band as a whole. They even tried to get me to use a pick!

What were you using for distortion when you first joined Fleetwood Mac?

Itwas a old Sony 2-track tape machine that I'd rigged up. The deck had input and output gain controls, and you could overdrive one gain stage with the other. It was solid-state sounding, but it worked.

I bought the deck when I first got interested in recording, and had read about Les Paul doing his sound-on-sound thing. I cut my teeth on recording and overdubbing with that machine. It eventually broke down, but the fuzz part still worked, so I plugged into it for my lead tone.

You are the most noted use of the Turner Model I. How did you discover that guitar?

Rick Turner had worked for Alembic for a long time, and the guitars they made were the equivalent of the basses the John [McVie, Fleetwood Mac bassist]still has. There were so much stuff on those instruments-parametric EQ and all this other cleverness. Anyway, Rick would ask me to try these different Alembic guitars, and they were always big and heavy with dense, exotic woods and brass hardware. They felt very sterile to me, and I finally said to him, "Why don't you make me something that's a cross between what you do and a Les Paul."

One day, during the sessions for Tusk, Rick showed up with the Model I. It was more about finding the ideal stage guitar, because as much as the Les Paul was fitting the bill in a fairly good way, it wasn't giving my picking a fare shake. The Turner sounded slightly ore percussive and articulate-somewhere between a Les Paul and an acoustic guitar-and the tone worked better with my fingerstyle playing. I even used to put a set of .012-.052 flatwounds on it, but now I'm using a .010-.046 roundwound set.

I've noticed you sometimes rotate the pickup on your Turner so that the bass side is closer?

That's the sweet spot for me. It delivers a little more definition on the low end-which helps me cut through the band-and having the treble side of the pickup closer to the neck sweetens the top strings.

Do you still use single-coil guitars in the studio?

Yes. I use the Turner for lead playing and chunky rhythm parts in the studio, but a Strat or a Tele works better when I'm trying to orchestrate guitar parts, and I need something that's voiced more sublimely.

Who was your main lead guitar influence?

I can't say t was one person. I used to love Led Zeppelin, but I never sat around trying to learn Jimmy Page licks. In terms of developing a sense of melody, I was helped along by Dave Mason's Alone Together -a wonderful album with a very pretty kind of lead-guitar style. But I never thought of myself as someone who was going to go out there and burn it up. In fact, the lead stuff came very late for me.

How has technology influenced the way you make records?

It hasn't. I still have a traditional console-it's not even computerized-and I still record to tape. I would like to change the way I record, though, because I now wish I had some of the editing capabilities that allow you to do things quicker.

But you did use a Roland VG-8 to record much of the album. Were any conventional amps used in the studio?

Well, you're right about that level of technology-we hardly used any amplifiers. Although for "Gift Of Screws", we put a bunch of amps in different rooms, and mixed and matched the sonds until we got what we wanted. The amps included a Fender Bassman and a Vox AC30.

You get a very clearly defined sound on both your nylon- and steel-string acoustics. Do you record them with a mic or a pickup, or both?

A lot of times, I'm running direct with a pickup-although I'll sometimes mic the guitar to capture a little more air in the acoustic sound.

When you layer acoustic sounds, you often seem to include your Dobro.

Yeah, that same riff I've been playing for years! The Dobro is tuned to dropped D. I probably got that from listening to Stephen Stills in the late 60's.

You flail the strings aggressively with your right hand, yet your sound is very articulate and precise. Can you give us some insight into your technique?

Flailing-and bit of frailing-pretty much describes it. I don't think about it much because I've never had any formal training. I never sat around and practiced scales, and I never took any lessons. I'm still very limited in some ways.

Is it that guitar playing comes so natural to you that you tend to focus more on the songs and less on the instrument?